"Some content may be acceptable in one region, but it is perfectly acceptable in another"
Parts of the film "Innocent Muslims" published on the YouTube network does not violate the conditions of using the services of Google, which owns the network, according to statements from Google, according to The New York Times.
Google, as reported, blocked access to the video in India and Indonesia, where it is displaying video content for which the Muslim world at his feet for a few days, violate local laws.
Google has temporarily banned access to video on Wednesday in Egypt and Libya, not because the company is, as stated, are considered to violate the law or because they were showing parts of the film "Innocent Muslims" violated YouTube's Terms of Service, but because they estimate that the such a measure is necessary because of the seriousness of the situation.
The video is available in the rest of the world, even though the protests will spread to nearly 20 countries, from North Africa to Indonesia.
At Google, we state that the decision was made in accordance with the ordinance, which takes into account both the policy of the company, and the laws of the countries in which YouTube users have access to the network. In addition, Google also considers the cultural norms in environments where users have access to its service.
"Some content may be acceptable in one region, but it is perfectly acceptable in another," reminiscent of the company on the policy adopted in 2007.
Controversy over video showing clips of the Muslim countries who believe that mocked the Prophet Mohammed, brings into question the role of Google in determining what is acceptable content shown online, and which is not.
YouTube users can ensmetano to set the content they want. Every minute on that network gets set to 72 hours of video. Facilities classified as inadequate unless they designate such other users, or if Google receives a valid court order, and if there is a request for the removal of certain state facilities for breaking the law.
That's in case of displaying parts of the film "Innocence Muslims' case in India and Indonesia, countries whose laws prohibit displaying content that provoke hostility.
Google were treating a total of 45 countries, including Egypt, not Libya, Pakistan or Avagnistan.
"We restrict access video in the countries in which we are otherwise required by law," as reported by the company.
At Google, he says, support the people's right to freedom of expression, but they are well aware that freedom of expression can not be unlimited.
It is difficult to determine where those boundaries. For companies such as Google, which provides services in more than 100 countries in the world, countries with different national laws and cultural norms, it is a challenge we face every day. "
Unlike Google, Facebook are in at the request of the government, restrict access to the link to the movie in Pakistan.
Low-cost and highly questionable artistic film "Innocent Muslims" infuriated Muslims across the Arab world for presenting Mohammad as a violent womanizer.
Islam forbids showing the Prophet Muhammad in any form, especially in a pejorative context. The case with the Prophet Muhammad cartoons in newspapers in Denmark has sparked a wave of violence in many Muslim countries.
Brought one of the authors of the book
The U.S. federal police took to examining one of the authors of "Innocent Muslims" Nakulua Baseleja, which has caused a wave of protests in Muslim countries.
According to data from the media, Nakula was taken to the police station, accompanied by several police officers.
Police said that the author of the film voluntarily surrendered, and that therefore he had no handcuffs, reported Radio "Echo of Moscow".
He is talking about a possible breach of the suspended sentence, police reported today.
Spokesman for the Los Angeles County Sheriff said that Nakula voluntarily left home accompanied by sheriff's deputies to speak to the police station in Seritos in California, but that is not in custody.
"With him, it will discuss the federal police probation. Either at one time he was not handcuffed to the arm. Was all on a voluntary basis," said spokesman Steve Viitmor, Tskhinvali.
Nakula (55) is defended illness in order to receive a reduced sentence for bank fraud 2010th year. In a court transcript in which the AP had access, writes that Nakula had hepatitis C, diabetes and other diseases.
AP states that Nakula member of Coptic Christians in the United States.
His counsel argued that Nakula must care for a sick father and children and sought to house arrest.
Other media reports said Nakula provided organizational support to other writers of the film.
Posted on: 15/09/2012 16:33
No comments:
Post a Comment